Police Story

Art

25.07.2011

Police Story

(I was asked to write the following as the text accompaniment to Dylan Scott’s “Google Squalor” this month, on exhibition at the University of Auckland’s Window Gallery. It’s a fine install, with a political edge that Auckland art doesn’t always have - less so, for example, than what you see in Wellington. Dylan talked persuasively about rock, copyright, Black Flag and “Lipstick Traces” in his proposal, which influenced me in turn. It’s perhaps not the most sober-minded look at New Zealand’s ‘three strikes’ bill on Internet file sharing, but I genuinely feel the law marks both a thin end of the wedge in terms of law to benefit rights holders, and a repellent use of parliamentary process.)

“Understand, we’re fighting a war we can’t win!/They hate us, we hate them – we can’t win!” (Black Flag, 1981)

They used an earthquake that killed nearly 200 people, in the end. On the morning of the 14 April 2011, the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Bill flew through the New Zealand parliament under urgency. Legislating under urgency is widely accepted as a response to crisis. You hammer through laws to rebuild the biggest city in the South Island, restore power and water to cold homes and freezing families. So we understood it. You can do a lot of things under the aegis of a crisis, as it turns out.

The National government and its allies, including the MP’s of the Act party, United Future, and the Maori Party, supported it. So did the opposition Labour Party. In fact, it was only challenged by the Green Party’s nine members of parliament, choleric and frequently absent Labour Party outcast Chris Carter, and maverick Te Tai Tokerau firebrand Hone Harawira.

New Plymouth MP Jonathan Young spoke about the need to control the Internet, pleading with a half-deserted House and asking if they remembered the Terminator movies. He compared their fictional artificial intelligence network, Skynet, to the Internet today (Skynet enslaved and killed the majority of the human race in a fit of genocide, an act only marginally less offensive than torrenting the entire discography of the Red Hot Chili Peppers). Naturally, he was squeaky clean when it came to his online conduct. He had recently purchased MP3’s of a Simon and Garfunkel best-of compilation, parting with a mere $17.

We were here once before, remember? Cast your mind back one, two, two-and-a-bit years. A swathe of Facebook profile pictures, blacked out in anticipation of the imminent passage of the Copyright Amendment (New Technologies) Act. You may still have yours. That was a bill of the Labour government’s. John Phillip Key, still flush with a very human and entirely natural urge to be liked, canned it at the 11th hour. A show of statesmanship. And then it got resurrected amid the wreckage and ruin. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss, as The Who once said (survivors to the last, of which more anon).

So let’s take a wander through The Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Act’s Greatest Hits (out in New Zealand on September 1, re-issued on DualDisc, copy-controlled to the latest standards). All business, it even comes with an executive summary of sorts at the top (emphases mine):

122B Overview of infringing file sharing regime

(1) Sections 122A to 122U provide rights owners with a special regime for taking enforcement action against people who infringe copyright through file sharing.
(2) The regime provides that, at the instigation of rights owners, IPAPs must issue infringement notices to alleged infringers.
(3) The 3 kinds of infringement notices, in the order in which they are given, are a detection notice, a warning notice, and an enforcement notice.
(4) After an enforcement notice is issued to an alleged infringer, the rights owner may take enforcement action by seeking the following orders against the alleged infringer:




    • “(a) an order from the Tribunal for a sum of up to $15,000:

    • “(b) an order from a District Court requiring the IPAP to suspend the account holder’s Internet account for up to 6 months.




(5) Time limits apply to all stages of the regime.
(6) This section is by way of explanation only. If any provision is inconsistent with it, the other provision prevails.

Okay. Not terrible legalese, at least. Merciful with the jargon. Long story short, an IPAP is basically whoever you pay to get your Internet each month. Orcon, Vodafone, Telecom. IPAPs all. Rights holders are exactly what you would imagine. Big record labels, big movie companies, huge multimedia consortiums. Lumbering entertainment monoliths of the 20th century, grafting new limbs on, discarding decaying extremities, merging with one another. Dogged, unrecognizable survivors. Doing what it takes to survive, and if compact discs don’t shift anymore, you’d better find out a surefire way of making coin in their place.

- nothing I do, nothing I say/I tell them to go get fucked/They put me away –

IPAPs are, of course, businesses. They’re risk-averse, which means that they’re not terribly likely to tell a rights holder or one of the associations they operate out of to take a hike. Actually, they’re not terribly likely to say “Are you sure about that? Could you double-check?” or “I think it’s probably just a 12-year-old sharing lots of Miley Cyrus, maybe just leave it, eh bro?” This willingness to work with rights holders will probably mean quite a few detection, warning, and enforcement notices. Perhaps in that order. Time will tell. Don’t forget to open your mail.

Let’s say that you eventually do open your mail and find around about three of these:

122N Infringement notice as evidence of copyright infringement

(1) In proceedings before the Tribunal, in relation to an infringement notice, it is presumed:
(a) that each incidence of file sharing identified in the notice constituted an infringement of the right owner’s copyright in the work identified;
(b) that the information recorded in the infringement notice is correct;
(c) that the infringement notice was issued in accordance with this Act.
(2) An account holder may submit evidence that, or give reasons why, any 1 or more of the presumptions in subsection (1) do not apply with respect to any particular infringement identified in an infringement notice.
(3) If an account holder submits evidence or gives reasons as referred to in subsection (2), the rights owner must satisfy the Tribunal that, in relation to the relevant infringement or notice, the particular presumption or presumptions are correct.

Without resorting to cliche, how an offence usually works is that you’re innocent until proven guilty. Starting with the reverse presumption that someone most definitely did the deed, and that it’s now for them to piece their way out of it, is actually fairly rare – the kind of presumption that operates when you park a car in the wrong place a bit too long and get a ticket. Not when you get fined up to $15,000 and lose your Internet for half a year.

In Google Squalor, Dylan Scott discards a balaclava, strewn across the floor of the University of Auckland Library Foyer. It’s perfect. People download at university everyday – thousands of people, thousands of things – and what better place for a thief to leave evidence then in the middle of a looting spree?  A balaclava is always worn by a thief, of course. Every good bad guy – every criminal – needs a good costume.

- think they’re smart, can’t think for themselves -

Does it always have to a bad guy? As a bit of a genre experiment, I might ask you to imagine that this Bill had been around for our idyllic youth (Napster; Limewire; the unendurable teenage male agony of softcore porn on dial-up) and picture yourself going onto Dad’s computer at work to download The Offspring, or Limp Bizkit, or Metallica. Something of classic heft with a sizeable record company behind it. Drop-D chords, made of pewter. Anyway, you download once, twice, three times. The warnings come through, get lost in work’s internal mail. Then one day, the shit hits the fan. Eventually, the Internet connection is switched off, a fine for thousands of dollars comes through the post. The music’s found on Dad’s computer, and he’s told to clear his desk by midday. Pretty fly. Pretty bleak.

So, in anticipation of falling afoul of the law, the question we need to ask is this: how will we soundtrack/use up our three strikes? With all due respect to Dylan, Black Flag are no good for such antics. The recordings are owned by the band’s blazed and brilliant guitarist, Greg Ginn, lost somewhere in the Texas haze. You should probably buy a record off him, but he won’t care too much either way. Besides, wouldn’t you feel silly doing Internet crimes to an actual punk band? I would. This needs to be stuff you’ll actually get pulled up for:

Strike One/Detection Notice: Flo Rida’s Jump (Rights holder: Warner Music Group)

When I say jump, you say how high. Because pride comes before a fall. Cocksure, confident, like all good pop music it’s a bit of an opiate and there’s no indication that anything bad ever really happens, anywhere. Insane hook.

Strike Two/Warning Notice: Rage Against The Machine’s Killing In The Name Of… (Rights holder: Sony Music)

First taste of rebellion, now. Not really all that aware of the actual extent of authority and therefore not really all that afraid to stare back, unblinking. Seethe. Possibly mosh a little. Fuck you, I won’t do what you tell me. Et al.

Strike Three/Enforcement Notice: The Rolling Stones’ Anybody Seen My Baby? (Rights holder: EMI Group)

They say American musician Robert Johnson met the Devil at the crossroads, swapping spiritual and technical mastery of the blues for a drastically shortened lifespan. Today’s rock n’ roll’s survivors have made an entirely different Faustian pact. Longevity exchanged for youthful beauty, untold riches arm in arm with a long, turgid and incontinent twilight. She confessed her love to me, then she vanished.

Appropriately, we’ll go down for 15K to this revolting 90s ditty. Two kinds of survivors – the former young and beautiful rebels, and the jet-set nine-to-fivers that wrote their contracts, licensed their songs for tobacco ads, and order cease-and-desist orders when 15-year old black kids from Berkeley sample them on YouTube . A pair of husks, fused together and flailing in the rubble of what they had. Furious. This is where we catch a stray fist.

The Unmissables: Three Exhibitions to see in November
Read Time: 7 mins
The best art on show this month in the dealer galleries...
Art
The Unmissables: Three Exhibitions to see in November
By Pantograph Punch
Paper Cuts: A Zine on Zinemaking in Aotearoa & Asia
Read Time: 1 min
A zine about zines: Nina Mingya Powles makes a zine...
Art
Paper Cuts: A Zine on Zinemaking in Aotearoa & Asia
By Nina Mingya Powles
The Art of Protest
Read Time: 16 mins
Ten New Zealand artworks from ‘Protest Tautohetohe...
Art
The Art of Protest
By Stephanie Gibson, Matariki Williams and Puawai Cairns
Painting With Whenua: An Interview with Raukura Turei
Read Time: 10 mins
Raukura Turei paints with natural clay pigment, evoking...
Art
Painting With Whenua: An Interview with Raukura Turei
By Jade Kake
The Unmissables: Three Exhibitions to See in October
Read Time: 7 mins
The best art on show this month in the dealer galleries...
Art
The Unmissables: Three Exhibitions to See in October
By Pantograph Punch
Is That the Pacific Ocean, or Just My Tears? A Review of Moana Don’t Cry
Read Time: 14 mins
An exhibition about the Pacific should centre Pacific...
Art
Is That the Pacific Ocean, or Just My Tears? A Review of Moana Don’t Cry
By Lana Lopesi
Not All Knowledge is Yours to Share: A Review of How to Live Together
Read Time: 17 mins
Dilohana Lekamge reviews How To Live Together, an...
Art
Not All Knowledge is Yours to Share: A Review of How to Live Together
By Dilohana Lekamge
The Power of the Pussy Bow: Fighting Back Against Rape-Art
Read Time: 21 mins
On her first international art residency, Wellington...
Art
The Power of the Pussy Bow: Fighting Back Against Rape-Art
By Emily Hartley-Skudder